docs(design): the full-site visual sweep findings — 50 pages reviewed, ranked #5535
ccantynzAI Reviewcommented 6d ago
AI Triage
(no summary)
Priority: medium Risk area: mixed
Suggested labels: (no label suggestions) Suggested reviewers: (no reviewer suggestions)
Suggestions only — nothing has been applied. The PR author stays in control.
gluecron[bot]🤖 botAI Reviewcommented 6d ago
AI review unavailable
The platform's AI balance is exhausted, so AI generation is temporarily unavailable. Nothing was lost. You can queue this as a repair for the internal agent from the repository's Health page, or try again once the balance is restored. The PR is otherwise unchanged.
Cross-repo impact
See what breaks downstream if this PR merges.
⮌ Merged
This pull request was merged into main.
c comment · e edit title · m merge · a approve · r request changes · ? shortcuts
The platform, seen completely for the first time: 558 screenshots, three vision reviewers, every finding ranked. Five criticals — the landing page itself worst of all (6–7 dead placeholder sections, fully inert dark mode, duplicated mobile hero), two surfaces that lie (DORA telling visitors we never deploy beside a 926-gate-run tile; bus-factor rendering zero-scan as a green all-clear), an illegible security banner, and a dark-inert off-brand login. Plus the counterweight: dark mode is genuinely complete on every other reviewed page and the core repo surfaces pass clean. Ends with the three-wave fix queue. Sweep-integrity note: our own rate limiter ate 43 captures and serves browsers raw JSON — both now on the list.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code